In defamation, how is libel different from slander?

• A. Libel is spoken, slander is written
• B. Libel is written, slander is spoken
• C. Libel involves monetary loss, slander does not
• D. Libel is public, slander is private

Answer: (B)

In the context of defamation, libel and slander are distinguished primarily by the medium through which the defamatory statement is communicated. Libel refers to defamatory statements that are made in a permanent form, typically written or published, such as in books, articles, or online content. This permanence means that the defamatory material can be reproduced, widely disseminated, and referred back to over time, which often leads to a greater potential for harm.

On the other hand, slander pertains to defamatory statements that are spoken or conveyed in a transient manner. Since slander is typically not recorded or published, it may not have the same enduring impact as libel. In many legal systems, the distinction emphasizes the nature of the communication itself, with libel generally considered to carry a heavier burden of proof due to its potential for lasting damage.

Understanding this distinction is crucial for anyone studying defamation law, as it influences how cases are approached and the evidential requirements involved.